Outer-Island Connectivity in Pacific Island Nations
What will changing population patterns mean for future maritime connectivity costs, already the highest in the world? Andrew Irvin, Micronesian Center for Sustainable Transport.
Our shipping cost, per tonne/nautical mile, is the highest in the world,
and serves as a primary barrier to progress across UN Sustainable Development
Goals. Pacific populations are in flux, with accelerating internal migration
from outer islands to urban centers. Internationally, shipping is embarking on
a decarbonisation agenda. Shipping in the Pacific needs to understand these future
changes when planning today. Our transport needs in 2050 will likely be quite
different from what they are in 2020.
For Pacific Islands, the phenomenon
of urban drift is taken to an extreme, unmatched elsewhere around the globe,
though the remote nations of the Pacific may not be what comes to mind when the
term “urban” is used. With a current population of approximately 12 million
people across 22 Pacific Island Countries and Territories (8.5 million of whom
are in PNG) the region has the most far-flung communities and cultures, with
more exclusive economic zone area and languages per capita than any other
region of the world. These socio-geographic realities necessitate an entirely
different scale and approach in development response to encourage improved
connectivity in line with national, regional, and global SDG commitments.
Despite the limited resources available to address these needs, Pacific Islands
represent the frontline fighting climate change, and are proactively seeking to
mitigate its effects and costs.
With existential threats mounting,
including a vicious combination of ocean acidification, increasingly powerful
and erratic cyclone seasons, sea-level rise and groundwater intrusion,
climate-related emigration is an increasingly pertinent topic requiring greater
recognition and response. However, before the geographic and demographic
stressors become an international issue, countries face the societal pressures
of domestic demographic shifts. The development divide that exists between
rural and urban communities in the Pacific is largely a consequence of the
limited financial resources and human capacity to provide distributed civil
services. This has resulted in steady and increasing urban drift.
The Case for
Connectivity
There are two assumptions which
have driven the global shipping industry since moving away from sailing vessels
in the latter half of the 19th century; a) economies of scale decrease the cost
of goods per unit, and b) propulsion provided by fossil fuels is worth the cost
of its use in reducing trip duration and increasing reliability of service. Neither
of these benefit the outer-island populations in the Pacific. Acknowledging the
Pacific’s ~95% dependence on imported fossil fuels, with transport often using
the majority of this fuel, combined with small and scattered populations, the
supply chain is stretched thin, and the cost of logistics are some of the most
expensive per unit/nautical mile, in the world. A recent survey of shipping agencies operating
in Fiji by USP and IUCN analyzed shipping costs per cubic meter, 20’, and 40’
container, and found the cost 312% higher between major ports in the Pacific
when compared to the costs of shipping in Southeast Asia[1][2].
Figure 1: Cost Comparison - A selection of urban ports in Southeast Asia & Oceania (IUCN shipping survey, July 2018)
Even more alarming, once the
distance between ports is included in the calculation, the Pacific pays an
average of 560% more per nautical mile than Southeast Asia. Shipping within the
region can be 834% more per nautical mile than for goods shipped from Singapore
to Suva. This disparity in cost of doing business is not generally captured as
an economic barrier to regional development. Transporting goods beyond our
international ports to outer islands incurs additional costs.
Figure 2: Cost Comparison - Rates per Nautical Mile in Southeast Asia & Oceania (IUCN
shipping survey, July 2018)
The barrier to sustainable
shipping in the Pacific is the current cost structure, which is a consequence
of reliance on global market supply of both goods and the vessels on which
these goods are transported. In both instances, Pacific countries have to pay
higher rates for lower quality purchases. The nations of the Pacific are
currently in a poverty trap. Financial
limitations prevent the transition to the existing and emerging generation of
high-efficiency vessels, which may realize fuel savings sufficient enough to
allow supply chains to extend to outer island communities without prohibitively
high premiums required to offset operational costs.
Imported petroleum products are a primary
driver of the Pacific’s debt burden, accounting for an average of ~40% of GDP
across the region. The challenges faced include the reliance of vessels
(fishing, cargo, and passenger) on imported fossil fuels, and a generally poor
quality supporting infrastructure (modern ports, bunkering, shipbuilding, and
repair) for the maritime transport sector. While regional shipping services use
relatively modern and well-maintained vessels complaint with IMO international
standards, at domestic scale there is a prevalence of inefficient and
under-maintained vessels. Recognition of these challenges has led to the formation
of the Pacific Blue Shipping Partnership [footnote], which seeks to catalyse
the transition to new shipping technology in order to reduce the cost of
improving connectivity across the Pacific and help turn the tide against the
current poverty trap.
Demographic Decline
Initial research of urbanization trends afflicting
the Pacific illustrates the urgent need for outer-island connectivity to ensure
distribution of services, economic activity, and associated benefits. A
regional pattern is emerging of outer islands depopulating steadily. In the context of the Cook Islands, the entire
nation is seeing a loss of 2.0% of its population, with 74.6% of the population
concentrated in the capital of Rarotonga as of the 2016 Census. Growth was only
noted on three islands (Nassau, Rakahanga, and Penrhyn), represented by only 24
individuals total. Overall, the country lost 360 people from 2011-2016[3].
Fiji’s 2017 Census reveals provincial-level
shifts in population, with significant decline in remote areas such as Lau,
Lomaiviti, Macuata, and Rotuma (losing 8,543 people total). Both Lau and Rotuma
experienced losses of over 10% and 20%, respectively, in the 2007-2017 period Fiji’s Government Shipping Service and
Shipping Franchise Scheme are typical of the various regional initiatives where
the State provides the transport service or a subsidy is provided to the
private sector to ensure the provision of shipping services from urban areas to
outer island communities. $2.3 million is allocated in Fiji’s 2019-20 national
budget for the Franchise Scheme, but even this subsidy is not staving off
migration to Viti Levu, Fiji’s main island. The provinces of Naitasiri, Namosi,
and Tailevu, which all surround Rewa, where, Suva – the capital of Fiji – is
located, all saw more than 10% growth on top of 7% growth in Rewa[4]
(gaining 33,772 of the nation’s total growth).
The same pattern of urban drift is
evident in Kiribati, with the South Tarawa Atoll now housing 51.2% of the total
population (57.2% with North Tarawa Atoll included). Kiritimati is also seeing
growth over 15%, but only houses 5.9% of the population, as of the 2015 Census[5].
Likewise, the Marshall Islands census
data clearly depicts the trend towards urbanization over the last 30 years with
Kwajalein and Majuro being home to 73.8% alongside rapid depopulation of the
majority of the outer atolls after a greater rate of population growth during
the 1988-1999 period. In the 1999-2011 period, outer islands at a median rate
of -13.6% (with some exceeding 30% loss)[6].
Tuvalu provides an extreme
example of urbanization – all outer islands are rapidly depopulating (losing at
least 10% between 2012 and 2017), and only Funafuti is experiencing positive
population growth[7]. In
every example above, the island where the national capital is located supports
over 50% of the national population, and this shift in demographic distribution
represents a concentration in risk for each nation in the event of natural
disasters which may potential impact each capital city.
Reliance on global supply chains,
exacerbated by fossil fuel dependence and centralized through colonial and
post-independence governance mechanisms around the region, reorganized what
were previously broadly decentralized economies. Now the Pacific is seeing populations
gravitate towards the competitive advantage provided in cities to participate
in cash economies. The extremely high geographic distribution of a relatively
small population allows the social impacts of urbanization to be seen in
greater focus and relative scope.
Decarbonisation of
Pacific shipping in line with the ambitious targets now being set by leaders in
Fiji and Marshall Islands offers a unique opportunity to rethink maritime connectivity
– the lifeline of our outer island communities.
Such opportunity will only be fully realised if based on sound planning
that is cognisant of our rapidly changing island population demographics.
[2] http://ports.com/sea-route
[3] http://www.mfem.gov.ck/images/documents/Statistics_Docs/5.Census-Surveys/6.Population-and-Dwelling_2016/2016_CENSUS_REPORT-FINAL.pdf
[4] https://spccfpstore1.blob.core.windows.net/digitallibrary-docs/files/15/1592831742c99180fb51d4fa9d21ee98.pdf
[5] http://www.mfed.gov.ki/sites/default/files/Revised%20Census%20Preliminary%20Report%202%20020516%20update%20%5B1306646%5D.pdf
[6] https://rmi-data.sprep.org/system/files/Marshall_Islands_Census_2011-Full.pdf
[7] tuvalu.prism.spc.int/index.php/tuvalu-documents?view=download&fileId=713
Comments
Post a Comment