Equity and equitable transition: In a world of Shipping decarbonisation
The Maritime Center for Sustainable
Transport (MCST) organizes a running series of e-Bwebwenato (in
Marshallese)/e-Talanoa sessions every month with the overarching theme of
“Framing High Ambition.” The event which took place on September 1st
was centered around ambition and equity. This followed the submission, “Resolution on zero emissions no
later than 2050” made to the upcoming 77th Marine
Environment Protection Committee (MEPC77) by Kiribati, Solomon Islands, and
Marshall Islands. The recent
IPCC report being quoted in interventions at regional or international forums
should not come as a surprise. It is a red code for humanity and yet at the International
Maritime Organisation (IMO) we are still arguing about whether we should be
highly ambitious or rather be just ambitious.
We worry about equal opportunities, rights –
equality in general. Where does equity and equitable transition for shipping
decarbonisation fit in? Equality means giving everyone the same thing, whereas
equity means giving people what they need to reach their best health. This
picture below perfectly describes the equity debate, and we use this in our
e-Bwebwenato series to define equity.
The last box of Justice says that “the cause(s) if the inequity was addressed, the systemic barrier has been removed”. What I see is all boxes have boys – there is more in the picture than the gender inequality.
The most climate vulnerable
countries – especially the Pacific Islands – have asked the shipping industry
to compensate for the years of carbon emitted which has fueled their industrial
revolution and often generous profit margins. The carbon levy submission by the
Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands sets another highly ambitious benchmark for
the shipping industry.
A recent preliminary analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
found windfall profits amounting to billions of Euros to be concentrated in a
few large companies.
Study |
Sector/Year |
Carbon price assumption |
Windfall profit Estimate |
IPA Energy Consulting (2005) |
UK Phase I |
€15-25/tCO2 |
£800 million/year |
Sijm and Neuhoff (2006) |
DE, UK, FR, BE and NLPower sector in Phase I |
€20/tCO2 |
€5.3-7 billion per year |
Martin et al (2012)and Martin et al (2013) |
EU
all sectors in Phase III |
€30/tCO2 |
€3-7
billion per year |
Maxwell (2011) |
UK
Power sector in Phase II |
|
£1
billion per year |
Point Carbon WWF (2008) |
German
and UK Power sector in Phase II |
€21-32/tCO2 |
€14-34
bn for Germany €6-15
bn for UK |
Lise
et al (2010) |
EU
20 Power sector |
€20/tCO2 |
€35
billion |
Source:http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/56790/
What is equity then? What is equitable transition when purse strings are controlled by a handful of overdeveloped countries?
Author: Maria Sahib (Article published in Fiji Sun)
Comments
Post a Comment