Why Equity is Essential in the IMO negotiations in reducing GHG emissions from ships

Atina Schutz is a law student at the University of the South Pacific who has been closely following the IMO negotiations

 The shipping industry accounts for 3% of all CO2 emissions, and is on track to grow as high as between 50% and 250% in 2050. At the International Maritime Organization (IMO), discussions on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from ships are ongoing. While progress is slowly being made, the main thing people in the Pacific, and everywhere, should be watching is equity in the progress of GHG reduction debates. 

In the global market, the Pacific is at a disadvantage. Our small economies, with distantly spread islands, are very far from the global market, which is heavily concentrated in the Global North. When it is time to decarbonize, that disadvantage will be exacerbated. As decarbonization is a highly costly and technical process, the cost will fall on governments already struggling to provide other equally important services to their citizens. Consequently, Pacific states will lag behind their international counterparts whilst having their fleets subjected to the carbon pricing scheme to come. 

To help with this, a market-based measure (MBM) must be adopted at the IMO. Experts agree that an MBM is preferred because it provides an incentive for the market to decarbonize rapidly. While there are several MBMs on the table for debate at the IMO, the one providing the most equitable solution is the mandatory levy of US$100/tonne CO2 emitted by ships. The idea behind this particular proposal by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands is that some of its $90B/year revenue be distributed to help developing economies in their decarbonisation efforts. 

Furthermore, the Pacific has contributed the least to global emissions, yet is the most affected by it. When the time for decarbonisation comes, our countries will inevitably be left behind unless the international community comes to the fore and supports poorer countries in their decarbonisation efforts. 


In coming months, high-ambition Pacific delegations will enter a new round of discussions on GHG issues at the IMO, such as defining disproportionate negative impact and what countries fall under it, which MBM to adopt, and what target to reach by 2050. As states deliberate on these topics, one hopes equity will be taken into account in final decisions. Which States, if any, should be given financial assistance for their decarbonisation efforts? Which MBM best provides for an equitable transition for all member states? And which target ensures the viability of states most vulnerable to climate change by 2050? These are all issues that could be resolved quickly if equity would be a key factor in decision-making

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Go Sail Cargo – The new Corporate Entity and its potential

Image
In order to steer Go Sail Cargo towards sustainable zero-carbon growth and global expansion, a new business entity must be created. Capital raising is first on the list and here we must be clear in our goals and informed as to how to achieve them, but thinking laterally and being prepared to abandon preconceived ideas, unless they dovetail with the aims of the new company, is essential. In order to be taken seriously any new entity must present a practical, viable, scalable and profitable proposition that is demonstrably beneficial to all stakeholders. One that fulfills a clearly identified need and does so in a non-invasive and non-polluting manner for the foreseeable future. Go Sail Cargo ticks all those boxes. It is my aim to develop a structure that is essentially cooperative in ownership and concordant in action. Specifically, the Pacific Nations, with their overwhelming dependence on maritime transport and centuries of advanced and intuitive navigational skills s...
Read more

Shipping solutions – a call to arms

Image
For every time, every decade there are solutions. Mine are based on common sense and the need to take action. We offer true Zero-emission ships like our versatile C-100, not half-hearted compromises. Vessels that can be efficiently mass produced combining the best of time-tested sailing ships with the very best of proven technology. We’re ready to go, here’s how.   Zero-carbon operation is available right now by optimising the ships and reducing the power use.   The fully optimised ship , working with maximum efficiency starts with a computer-tuned hull for maximum performance, a safe, stable carrier that can be relied on to deliver the goods. Racing technology is applied to proven, practical rigs, the sail power is multiplied. Using wind and sun alone, the sails, wind generators and solar all work in unison to drive the vessel.   Reduce the power usage on board. Every single component must function reliably and efficiently by harnessing all available power. Here’s a f...
Read more

Harnessing Nature's Power: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion and Deep-Sea Water By-products

Image
Introduction In a world where renewable energy sources are becoming increasingly important, Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) stands out as a promising and largely untapped resource. This innovative technology leverages the temperature difference between warm surface water and cold deep-sea water to generate electricity. Additionally, OTEC offers a unique advantage - the utilization of deep-sea water by-products. In this blog, we will delve into the process of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion and explore the various potential applications of deep-sea water. In my previous blog post I explained a bit about the science behind the OTEC process, if you have not read it you can find it here . However, generally the process can be broken down into four main components. Seawater Selection: The first step in OTEC involves carefully selecting suitable locations where there is a significant temperature gradient between surface water and deep-sea water. These areas are typically found i...
Read more